<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Hidden Split on LinkedIn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brandwithin.com/branding/the-hidden-split-on-linkedin/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brandwithin.com/branding/the-hidden-split-on-linkedin</link>
	<description>The Knowledge Marketing Center</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 23:53:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoodJava</title>
		<link>http://brandwithin.com/branding/the-hidden-split-on-linkedin/comment-page-1#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>GoodJava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialbrandingcenter.com/?p=52#comment-394</guid>
		<description>Jon, based on my recent experience, your observations about LinkedIn seem so accurate.  I ventured there for the first time earlier today and felt I had to adapt and adjust and tweak and twiddle just to take my first tentative steps to getting my business profile up there.  However, it does appear to be an awesome tool if a network (such as this one) commits to it. Is a group such as ours capable of infusing our own adaptations to a site like this by agreeing on some common protocols?  In other words, do you think that there&#039;s much benefit in trying to co-opt their categories and distinctions to reflect the realities of the entrepreneur?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon, based on my recent experience, your observations about LinkedIn seem so accurate.  I ventured there for the first time earlier today and felt I had to adapt and adjust and tweak and twiddle just to take my first tentative steps to getting my business profile up there.  However, it does appear to be an awesome tool if a network (such as this one) commits to it. Is a group such as ours capable of infusing our own adaptations to a site like this by agreeing on some common protocols?  In other words, do you think that there&#8217;s much benefit in trying to co-opt their categories and distinctions to reflect the realities of the entrepreneur?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 1.963 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-09-06 17:45:20 -->
